Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. LOOT DROP 10/10 ESCALATIONS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You're missing the point. It's still higher than it was pre-Rhea, this adjustment isn't really even noticeable. My corp has been running a spreadsheet for months, we really haven't noticed a change. Call it luck, but I'm thinking you just don't ru...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.07.01 17:33:14
|
2. LOOT DROP 10/10 ESCALATIONS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
sayyes cyno wrote: Hi. I thought I had read that the drop rate of pirate BPCS was goanna b nerfed and that the change of getting a high end 10/10 escalation was lowered .... So BPCS change lowered and change on escalations lowered ? Did it a...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.07.01 16:46:20
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: ... Nasar Vyron wrote: They really should consider changing these to require BC 5 and just label them as BCs. Increase the build cost a little further and call it good. I'd still call for a nerf to speed with this regardless bu...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.20 17:06:30
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
They really should consider changing these to require BC 5 and just label them as BCs. Increase the build cost a little further and call it good. I'd still call for a nerf to speed with this regardless but at least doing this everything will begin...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.20 01:50:33
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rek Seven wrote: So the drone Proteus that currently hardly gets used is going to be made worse? Good job guys! Give it specific bonuses to medium drones only, to make it unique. The Gila would like a word with you.
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.19 02:11:41
|
6. Upwell structures should consume "base" amounts of fuel - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Kenneth Feld wrote: Reading is hard - re read the sentence you quoted - small amount per RUN each RUN takes more TIME, therefore more fuel/ice Did i really need to explain that to you? As far as towers, you will be able to do 100's of towe...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.18 23:07:03
|
7. Rogue Swarm - Kill Thieves - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Are you a Goon? Maybe they should drop in a 20k m3 container and flag everyone who warps in so you need to control grid to get the loot. HTFU - get at 0 and scoop faster. They take your loot? Kill them for it.
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.18 01:58:06
|
8. Upwell structures should consume "base" amounts of fuel - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Kenneth Feld wrote: No such thing, fuel and stront will be part of the materials for reactions, the longer the reaction the more fuel, so it will be proportional to your reaction, not to the structure Quote: The existing reactions will b...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.18 01:33:56
|
9. Upwell structures should consume "base" amounts of fuel - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Kenneth Feld wrote: Citadel didn't replace POS, it replaced POS AND Outpost Outpost never required fuel So, if it does require fuel and I litter HS and put 10 years of fuel in them, would that be ok with you? What about if it has online mo...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.17 22:49:42
|
10. Upwell structures should consume "base" amounts of fuel - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
100% behind this. I always felt it was ridiculous that an unfueled POS drops it's shield yet an unfueled citadel keeps tethering. I like your idea about the index, I had mentioned something similar a while back but it constellation based and each...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.17 15:25:46
|
11. Ghost training guidelines - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I just want time left on sub/account status added back into the API... or token whatever it is we're swapping into here shortly. I really dislike the fact that I need to log into every account's account management and mark this crap on my calenda...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.15 15:56:51
|
12. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lord Heluene wrote: So now CCP.............you have taken away my ability to mine, and you are about to take away my ability to rat........I don't PVP unless forced to. My bad, I didn't realize this patch removed all mining barges/exhume...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.14 16:35:08
|
13. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Less effective for carriers/supers simply translates to more frigates. Which I'm fine with, slows down the rate or which sites are cleared which was the whole goal of these changes to begin with.
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.12 18:06:17
|
14. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
xOmGx wrote: LOL CCP you are greate @ working 2 days before patch and its not even changed on TEST server lel so we can test nothing at all..... wonderfull "friday midday" last minute patch "what can we screw up in eve even more?" and someo...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.11 17:02:59
|
15. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Isuro Tanaka wrote: Sure seems like a lot of "1 % of 1%" people here...hmmm. You realize you're on the EVE forums correct? So ya, this is a fraction of a fraction of the actual playerbase. The majority of which are HS players who don't give ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.10 18:06:15
|
16. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Yodasmaster4 wrote: I disagree with the "bit too effective in PVP" just reduce the bounties. Have you looked at the damage output of a Erebus vs a Nyx? A Leviathan vs a Wyvern? Super's have higher sustained damage output than a titan as it ...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.10 00:24:57
|
17. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Buying Hell 50% off. I swear it's as if you guys don't read the same economic reports as I do. Be glad they are going this route and not just hitting bounties by like 40% which really would effect every player. They aren't even touching applicati...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.09 23:05:02
|
18. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: That kinda defeats part of the reason they are going down to 4 sets of 3 subs, which is to have better choices and remove useless combinations. Didn't realize cloak and nullification was a useless combination. Nul...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.08 03:53:16
|
19. Please advise: should i use merlin or kestrel - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'll do you one better. If you want to learn a little about the Kestrel head over to twitch and watch suitonia. The kestrel is one of the main cheap T1 ships he flies around in so you can watch and learn the basics and more advanced things about p...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.07 20:06:02
|
20. CCP Not Even Pretending. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Like I said, I don't care one way or the other. I see the benefits and drawbacks to their existence. Great for newbros trying to just catch up, bad for those who think they are actually buying power. I'd agree we are slightly better with than with...
- by Nasar Vyron - at 2017.06.07 19:51:30
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |